https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249943 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT BANGALORE, in a judgment delivered by Shri B.S.V. MURTHY, addressed issues regarding non-representation, remand requests, pre-deposit requirements, compliance timelines, and order enforcement. The Tribunal proceeded with the case due to the appellant's absence and rejected the illogical request for a stay. It upheld the pre-deposit requirement of 50% of the demanded amount, directing the appellant to deposit Rs. 6,00,00,000 within 8 weeks for timely compliance. Failure to comply would lead to dismissal of the appeal and enforcement of the Revenue's recovery rights. The order emphasized the importance of cooperation and prompt adjudication, with strict timelines set for resolution. en-us Tue, 01 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 19 Jan 2015 10:33:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249943 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT BANGALORE, in a judgment delivered by Shri B.S.V. MURTHY, addressed issues regarding non-representation, remand requests, pre-deposit requirements, compliance timelines, and order enforcement. The Tribunal proceeded with the case due to the appellant's absence and rejected the illogical request for a stay. It upheld the pre-deposit requirement of 50% of the demanded amount, directing the appellant to deposit Rs. 6,00,00,000 within 8 weeks for timely compliance. Failure to comply would lead to dismissal of the appeal and enforcement of the Revenue's recovery rights. The order emphasized the importance of cooperation and prompt adjudication, with strict timelines set for resolution. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 01 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249943