<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (7) TMI 965 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249929</link>
    <description>The court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to cancel the penalty imposed under Section 271-B for the assessment year 1987-88. It was determined that the Assessing Officer did not record the necessary satisfaction in the assessment order before initiating penalty proceedings, as required by legal precedents. As a result, the penalty was deemed unjustified, and the appeal by the department was dismissed in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2015 17:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=360748" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (7) TMI 965 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249929</link>
      <description>The court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to cancel the penalty imposed under Section 271-B for the assessment year 1987-88. It was determined that the Assessing Officer did not record the necessary satisfaction in the assessment order before initiating penalty proceedings, as required by legal precedents. As a result, the penalty was deemed unjustified, and the appeal by the department was dismissed in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249929</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>