<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (7) TMI 958 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249922</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed all three appeals of the assessee, setting aside the penalties imposed under section 271(1)(c) for the claim of interest. The decision was based on the lack of deliberate inaccurate particulars and justifiable reasons for non-compliance, aligning with legal precedents and the principles laid down by the Supreme Court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2014 09:25:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=360741" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (7) TMI 958 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249922</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed all three appeals of the assessee, setting aside the penalties imposed under section 271(1)(c) for the claim of interest. The decision was based on the lack of deliberate inaccurate particulars and justifiable reasons for non-compliance, aligning with legal precedents and the principles laid down by the Supreme Court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249922</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>