<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (7) TMI 944 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249908</link>
    <description>A pre-deposit order concerning a steam-related demand was set aside because the Tribunal had not examined the exemption notifications relied on for the relevant period. The Court remitted the waiver application to the Tribunal for fresh consideration only on that demand, without expressing any view on the merits. The waiver already granted on the separate demand remained undisturbed, so the reopening was limited to the steam issue alone.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2014 12:07:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=360717" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (7) TMI 944 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249908</link>
      <description>A pre-deposit order concerning a steam-related demand was set aside because the Tribunal had not examined the exemption notifications relied on for the relevant period. The Court remitted the waiver application to the Tribunal for fresh consideration only on that demand, without expressing any view on the merits. The waiver already granted on the separate demand remained undisturbed, so the reopening was limited to the steam issue alone.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249908</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>