<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (7) TMI 938 - MEGHALAYA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249902</link>
    <description>The High Court disposed of the stay vacation application in Misc. Case No. 66 of 2014, allowing locally transferred employees within the Customs, Central Excise, and Service Tax Department to continue without interference. However, it specified that the 6 employees transferred to Dibrugarh and Guwahati should not be relieved until the next listing date of the writ petition, provided they had not already been relieved.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2014 11:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=360705" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (7) TMI 938 - MEGHALAYA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249902</link>
      <description>The High Court disposed of the stay vacation application in Misc. Case No. 66 of 2014, allowing locally transferred employees within the Customs, Central Excise, and Service Tax Department to continue without interference. However, it specified that the 6 employees transferred to Dibrugarh and Guwahati should not be relieved until the next listing date of the writ petition, provided they had not already been relieved.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249902</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>