https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249897 The Tribunal held that M/s. SRL did not provide Real Estate Agent Service to M/s. SEL. The demand for duty and penalties under the Finance Act, 1994 was deemed unjustified as M/s. SRL independently purchased and sold land without providing services to M/s. SEL. The appeal was allowed with consequential relief, and the issue of limitation was considered irrelevant as the decision favored the appellant. The judgment was pronounced on 4.7.2014. en-us Fri, 04 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 17 Jan 2015 18:50:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249897 The Tribunal held that M/s. SRL did not provide Real Estate Agent Service to M/s. SEL. The demand for duty and penalties under the Finance Act, 1994 was deemed unjustified as M/s. SRL independently purchased and sold land without providing services to M/s. SEL. The appeal was allowed with consequential relief, and the issue of limitation was considered irrelevant as the decision favored the appellant. The judgment was pronounced on 4.7.2014. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 04 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249897