https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249896 The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in a case involving service tax demands on renting out pipes for agricultural operations, tangible goods, immovable property, and equipment hire. The demand for renting out pipes as supplying tangible goods was set aside due to lack of evidence of service provision. The demand for immovable property renting was dismissed based on limitation grounds. The appellant chose not to contest the equipment hire demand and settled the amount, with penalties waived under Section 80 of the Finance Act 1994. Overall, the appeal was decided in favor of the appellant. en-us Tue, 01 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 13 Jan 2016 17:31:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249896 The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in a case involving service tax demands on renting out pipes for agricultural operations, tangible goods, immovable property, and equipment hire. The demand for renting out pipes as supplying tangible goods was set aside due to lack of evidence of service provision. The demand for immovable property renting was dismissed based on limitation grounds. The appellant chose not to contest the equipment hire demand and settled the amount, with penalties waived under Section 80 of the Finance Act 1994. Overall, the appeal was decided in favor of the appellant. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 01 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249896