<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (7) TMI 925 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249889</link>
    <description>The High Court quashed the Tribunal&#039;s order and directed a fresh hearing, emphasizing that the Tribunal should focus on determining if there is enough evidence to support a complete waiver of pre-deposit and unconditional stay of recovery. The Court stressed that the Tribunal should not conclusively decide on the merits of the case and allowed the appeal without costs, instructing the Tribunal to decide the matter independently without being influenced by previous findings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2015 13:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=360692" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (7) TMI 925 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249889</link>
      <description>The High Court quashed the Tribunal&#039;s order and directed a fresh hearing, emphasizing that the Tribunal should focus on determining if there is enough evidence to support a complete waiver of pre-deposit and unconditional stay of recovery. The Court stressed that the Tribunal should not conclusively decide on the merits of the case and allowed the appeal without costs, instructing the Tribunal to decide the matter independently without being influenced by previous findings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249889</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>