https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249880 The court upheld the Central Administrative Tribunal's decision, dismissing the petitioner's claim for reinstatement and regularization of services. The court found the petitioner did not meet the requirements of the Casual Labourers (Grant of Temporary Status and Regularization) Scheme, 1993, as he had not completed the necessary 240 days of continuous service. Additionally, the court deemed the delay in filing the writ petition as inordinate and unexplained, leading to the dismissal of the petition on both delay and merit grounds, with no costs awarded. en-us Wed, 25 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 27 Jul 2014 10:20:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249880 The court upheld the Central Administrative Tribunal's decision, dismissing the petitioner's claim for reinstatement and regularization of services. The court found the petitioner did not meet the requirements of the Casual Labourers (Grant of Temporary Status and Regularization) Scheme, 1993, as he had not completed the necessary 240 days of continuous service. Additionally, the court deemed the delay in filing the writ petition as inordinate and unexplained, leading to the dismissal of the petition on both delay and merit grounds, with no costs awarded. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 25 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249880