<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (7) TMI 884 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249848</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the dismissal of the appeal due to a significant delay in filing after the order was pasted, rejecting the appellant&#039;s arguments challenging the decisions of the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals) and the Tribunal. Emphasizing the strict interpretation of the limitation period, the Court concurred with previous legal precedents and denied relief to the appellant, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s order without awarding any costs in the matter.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2015 16:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=360589" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (7) TMI 884 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249848</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the dismissal of the appeal due to a significant delay in filing after the order was pasted, rejecting the appellant&#039;s arguments challenging the decisions of the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals) and the Tribunal. Emphasizing the strict interpretation of the limitation period, the Court concurred with previous legal precedents and denied relief to the appellant, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s order without awarding any costs in the matter.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249848</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>