<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (7) TMI 859 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249823</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed all six appeals of the assessee, emphasizing the importance of incriminating material for re-assessment under section 153A. The judgment highlighted that without such material, the re-assessment of concluded assessments is not permissible. The decision underscored the need for valid reasons and justification for any disallowances, ultimately ruling in favor of the assessee in both issues of expenditure and depreciation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2014 13:56:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=360562" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (7) TMI 859 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249823</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed all six appeals of the assessee, emphasizing the importance of incriminating material for re-assessment under section 153A. The judgment highlighted that without such material, the re-assessment of concluded assessments is not permissible. The decision underscored the need for valid reasons and justification for any disallowances, ultimately ruling in favor of the assessee in both issues of expenditure and depreciation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249823</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>