<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (7) TMI 851 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249815</link>
    <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal against the order partially allowing the respondent&#039;s appeal was dismissed by the Tribunal. The Tribunal upheld the demand for service tax, interest, and penalties under Sections 75 and 78 but dropped the penalty under Section 76. Conflicting views on simultaneous penalties under Sections 76 and 78 were considered, with the Tribunal following the decision of the Punjab &amp;amp; Haryana High Court that simultaneous penalties cannot be imposed. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was based on jurisdictional considerations and precedent from the High Court, resulting in the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2014 19:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=360528" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (7) TMI 851 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249815</link>
      <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal against the order partially allowing the respondent&#039;s appeal was dismissed by the Tribunal. The Tribunal upheld the demand for service tax, interest, and penalties under Sections 75 and 78 but dropped the penalty under Section 76. Conflicting views on simultaneous penalties under Sections 76 and 78 were considered, with the Tribunal following the decision of the Punjab &amp;amp; Haryana High Court that simultaneous penalties cannot be imposed. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was based on jurisdictional considerations and precedent from the High Court, resulting in the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249815</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>