<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (7) TMI 848 - CESTAT  MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249812</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the order dismissing the appeal due to non-compliance with a stay order for a case involving tax liability on security services provided by a Superintendent of Police. The Tribunal ruled that as the appellant did not receive payment for the services, they were not liable to pay service tax. The matter was remanded to the Commissioner (Appeals) for a decision on merits without requiring a pre-deposit, ultimately disposing of the appeal and stay application.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2015 16:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=360525" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (7) TMI 848 - CESTAT  MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249812</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the order dismissing the appeal due to non-compliance with a stay order for a case involving tax liability on security services provided by a Superintendent of Police. The Tribunal ruled that as the appellant did not receive payment for the services, they were not liable to pay service tax. The matter was remanded to the Commissioner (Appeals) for a decision on merits without requiring a pre-deposit, ultimately disposing of the appeal and stay application.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249812</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>