https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249797 The appeal was dismissed due to the appellant's failure to comply with the Tribunal's order to deposit a specific sum within a set timeframe as required by Section 35-F of the Central Excise Act. The Tribunal had granted leniency by allowing time for partial deposit, but the appellant did not adhere to the order, leading to the dismissal of the appeal. The judges found no substantial legal question and closed the related motion based on the appellant's non-compliance with the Tribunal's directive. en-us Tue, 08 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 23 Jul 2014 18:07:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249797 The appeal was dismissed due to the appellant's failure to comply with the Tribunal's order to deposit a specific sum within a set timeframe as required by Section 35-F of the Central Excise Act. The Tribunal had granted leniency by allowing time for partial deposit, but the appellant did not adhere to the order, leading to the dismissal of the appeal. The judges found no substantial legal question and closed the related motion based on the appellant's non-compliance with the Tribunal's directive. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 08 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249797