<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (7) TMI 829 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249793</link>
    <description>The applications seeking an extension of the stay granted on 28.2.2013, due to delayed disposal of appeals under the Central Excise Act, were dismissed by the High Court. The court emphasized the legislative limits on extending stays beyond 365 days as per Section 35C(2A) of the Act, aligning with established legal principles. Despite references to Supreme Court and Tribunal judgments supporting the extension, the court relied on its own rulings and statutory provisions to vacate the stay as it exceeded the permissible 365-day period.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2014 12:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=360445" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (7) TMI 829 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249793</link>
      <description>The applications seeking an extension of the stay granted on 28.2.2013, due to delayed disposal of appeals under the Central Excise Act, were dismissed by the High Court. The court emphasized the legislative limits on extending stays beyond 365 days as per Section 35C(2A) of the Act, aligning with established legal principles. Despite references to Supreme Court and Tribunal judgments supporting the extension, the court relied on its own rulings and statutory provisions to vacate the stay as it exceeded the permissible 365-day period.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249793</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>