<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (7) TMI 823 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249787</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the impugned order, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding short-payment of service tax and penalties under the Finance Act, 1994. The Commissioner (Appeals) remanded the matter for further consideration based on a CA certificate, which was accepted by the lower authority. Despite challenges by the Revenue against the Assistant Commissioner&#039;s actions, the Tribunal found no harm caused and emphasized the need for coordination within the Department. Ultimately, the Tribunal concluded that the remand was justified for quantification purposes, similar to a previous case, leading to the rejection of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2014 11:22:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=360437" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (7) TMI 823 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249787</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the impugned order, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding short-payment of service tax and penalties under the Finance Act, 1994. The Commissioner (Appeals) remanded the matter for further consideration based on a CA certificate, which was accepted by the lower authority. Despite challenges by the Revenue against the Assistant Commissioner&#039;s actions, the Tribunal found no harm caused and emphasized the need for coordination within the Department. Ultimately, the Tribunal concluded that the remand was justified for quantification purposes, similar to a previous case, leading to the rejection of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249787</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>