<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (7) TMI 810 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249774</link>
    <description>The court upheld the ITAT&#039;s decision to allow the deduction under Section 10B of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 2004-05. The deletion of sub-section (9) removed the prohibition on claiming the deduction upon transfer of ownership, enabling the transferee to claim the benefit for the unexpired period. The appeal was dismissed, and the respondent was awarded costs as per Delhi High Court Rules.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2015 14:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=360422" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (7) TMI 810 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249774</link>
      <description>The court upheld the ITAT&#039;s decision to allow the deduction under Section 10B of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 2004-05. The deletion of sub-section (9) removed the prohibition on claiming the deduction upon transfer of ownership, enabling the transferee to claim the benefit for the unexpired period. The appeal was dismissed, and the respondent was awarded costs as per Delhi High Court Rules.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249774</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>