https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249746 Recovery of disputed tax through bankers pending appeal was not interfered with because appellate and revisional remedies had already been invoked, a stay application had been dealt with, and the revisional authority had granted stay on 50 per cent of the disputed tax. The Court held that no further writ relief was warranted on the recovery challenge in those circumstances. It also held that the stay orders were not non-speaking or arbitrary, because the record showed consideration of the dispute and the statute permitted stay on terms and conditions rather than an unconditional stay. The revisional stay order was allowed to continue until disposal of the appeals. en-us Mon, 23 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 22 Jul 2014 18:10:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249746 Recovery of disputed tax through bankers pending appeal was not interfered with because appellate and revisional remedies had already been invoked, a stay application had been dealt with, and the revisional authority had granted stay on 50 per cent of the disputed tax. The Court held that no further writ relief was warranted on the recovery challenge in those circumstances. It also held that the stay orders were not non-speaking or arbitrary, because the record showed consideration of the dispute and the statute permitted stay on terms and conditions rather than an unconditional stay. The revisional stay order was allowed to continue until disposal of the appeals. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Mon, 23 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249746