<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (7) TMI 772 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249736</link>
    <description>Registration under section 12AA(3) can be cancelled only where a trust&#039;s activities are shown to be non-genuine or not carried out in accordance with its objects. A proposed sale of hospital land was treated as a step to recoup funds already invested in a stalled charitable project, not as evidence of a commercial venture, so it did not justify cancellation. Purchase of a BMW in a trustee&#039;s name, even if questioned under section 13, affected exemption for the relevant year rather than registration, and did not by itself establish non-genuineness. Scholarship routing through another foundation and a temporary advance also did not show diversion or misuse, so cancellation was unwarranted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 15:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=360361" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (7) TMI 772 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249736</link>
      <description>Registration under section 12AA(3) can be cancelled only where a trust&#039;s activities are shown to be non-genuine or not carried out in accordance with its objects. A proposed sale of hospital land was treated as a step to recoup funds already invested in a stalled charitable project, not as evidence of a commercial venture, so it did not justify cancellation. Purchase of a BMW in a trustee&#039;s name, even if questioned under section 13, affected exemption for the relevant year rather than registration, and did not by itself establish non-genuineness. Scholarship routing through another foundation and a temporary advance also did not show diversion or misuse, so cancellation was unwarranted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249736</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>