<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (7) TMI 766 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249730</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, confirming that the assessee&#039;s treatment of the loss on the sale of capital assets as a revenue loss constituted furnishing inaccurate particulars of income. The Tribunal found no legal flaws in the AO and FAA&#039;s decisions, dismissing the appeal and affirming the penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2014 17:04:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=360355" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (7) TMI 766 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249730</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, confirming that the assessee&#039;s treatment of the loss on the sale of capital assets as a revenue loss constituted furnishing inaccurate particulars of income. The Tribunal found no legal flaws in the AO and FAA&#039;s decisions, dismissing the appeal and affirming the penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249730</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>