<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (3) TMI 601 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165480</link>
    <description>Refundable deposits on beer bottles and crates were not treated as sale consideration where the contract and conduct showed a continuing arrangement for return and reuse. Applying section 19 of the Sale of Goods Act, 1930, the SC found that property in the containers did not pass as part of an out-and-out sale because the supplier charged separate refundable deposits, facilitated return of empties, and issued credit notes on return. Any forfeiture for non-return was treated as liquidated damages under section 74 of the Contract Act, 1872, not as conversion of the deposit into sale price. The bottles and crates were therefore outside the taxable sale price.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2014 17:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=360318" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (3) TMI 601 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165480</link>
      <description>Refundable deposits on beer bottles and crates were not treated as sale consideration where the contract and conduct showed a continuing arrangement for return and reuse. Applying section 19 of the Sale of Goods Act, 1930, the SC found that property in the containers did not pass as part of an out-and-out sale because the supplier charged separate refundable deposits, facilitated return of empties, and issued credit notes on return. Any forfeiture for non-return was treated as liquidated damages under section 74 of the Contract Act, 1872, not as conversion of the deposit into sale price. The bottles and crates were therefore outside the taxable sale price.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165480</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>