<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (7) TMI 742 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249706</link>
    <description>Additional income admitted before income-tax authorities and linked to hotel sales activity was treated as suppressed sales turnover under the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, because the admission and records showed undisclosed business receipts rather than an unrelated source. The revisional authority was found competent to compute taxable turnover and levy tax on the basis of the assessee&#039;s own statement, balance-sheet entries, and undisputed material, without resorting to conjecture. Remand to the assessing authority was held unnecessary because the factual basis for levy was already admitted and no further enquiry was required.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2014 09:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=360271" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (7) TMI 742 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249706</link>
      <description>Additional income admitted before income-tax authorities and linked to hotel sales activity was treated as suppressed sales turnover under the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, because the admission and records showed undisclosed business receipts rather than an unrelated source. The revisional authority was found competent to compute taxable turnover and levy tax on the basis of the assessee&#039;s own statement, balance-sheet entries, and undisputed material, without resorting to conjecture. Remand to the assessing authority was held unnecessary because the factual basis for levy was already admitted and no further enquiry was required.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249706</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>