<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (7) TMI 732 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249696</link>
    <description>The court found the initiation of the sunset review valid as it occurred before the expiration of the original notification. However, the court deemed the levy of anti-dumping duty during the sunset review invalid as the necessary notification was not issued before the expiry of the original notification. The court declared the subsequent notification attempting to amend the original one as illegal, ordering a refund of amounts paid and partially allowing the writ petitions by setting aside the impugned notification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2014 15:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=360261" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (7) TMI 732 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249696</link>
      <description>The court found the initiation of the sunset review valid as it occurred before the expiration of the original notification. However, the court deemed the levy of anti-dumping duty during the sunset review invalid as the necessary notification was not issued before the expiry of the original notification. The court declared the subsequent notification attempting to amend the original one as illegal, ordering a refund of amounts paid and partially allowing the writ petitions by setting aside the impugned notification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249696</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>