https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249692 The Division Bench concluded that the company court cannot order the winding up of a company without advertising the petition, as per the judgment in *National Conduits (P) Ltd. v. S.S. Arora*. The appellant company was granted the opportunity to invoke the court's inherent powers under Rule 9 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959. However, the court upheld the rejection of the appellant's applications for cross-examination and additional documents. The appointment of the Official Liquidator as Provisional Liquidator and the direction for publication of the citation were deemed appropriate. The appeal was dismissed, emphasizing fair procedure and creditor/shareholder protection. en-us Tue, 08 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 21 Jul 2014 08:12:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249692 The Division Bench concluded that the company court cannot order the winding up of a company without advertising the petition, as per the judgment in *National Conduits (P) Ltd. v. S.S. Arora*. The appellant company was granted the opportunity to invoke the court's inherent powers under Rule 9 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959. However, the court upheld the rejection of the appellant's applications for cross-examination and additional documents. The appointment of the Official Liquidator as Provisional Liquidator and the direction for publication of the citation were deemed appropriate. The appeal was dismissed, emphasizing fair procedure and creditor/shareholder protection. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 08 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249692