<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (7) TMI 716 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249680</link>
    <description>STPI registration was treated as sufficient for eligibility to deduction under section 10B of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and separate prior approval by the Board of Approvals was held not essential on the Tribunal&#039;s consistent coordinate bench view. The Tribunal followed earlier decisions in similar cases and accepted that an assessee otherwise registered with STPI could claim the deduction without additional ratification. The CIT(A)&#039;s allowance of the claim was found consistent with that prevailing view, and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2014 13:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=360245" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (7) TMI 716 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249680</link>
      <description>STPI registration was treated as sufficient for eligibility to deduction under section 10B of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and separate prior approval by the Board of Approvals was held not essential on the Tribunal&#039;s consistent coordinate bench view. The Tribunal followed earlier decisions in similar cases and accepted that an assessee otherwise registered with STPI could claim the deduction without additional ratification. The CIT(A)&#039;s allowance of the claim was found consistent with that prevailing view, and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249680</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>