<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (7) TMI 714 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249678</link>
    <description>The appeals for assessment years 2002-03, 2005-06, and 2006-07 were allowed, and the additions made under Section 2(22)(e) of the Income-tax Act were deleted due to the lack of incriminating material. However, for assessment years 2007-08 and 2008-09, the appeals were dismissed, and the additions under Section 2(22)(e) were upheld as deemed dividends due to the substantial interest of the assessee in the recipient companies.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2014 07:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=360243" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (7) TMI 714 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249678</link>
      <description>The appeals for assessment years 2002-03, 2005-06, and 2006-07 were allowed, and the additions made under Section 2(22)(e) of the Income-tax Act were deleted due to the lack of incriminating material. However, for assessment years 2007-08 and 2008-09, the appeals were dismissed, and the additions under Section 2(22)(e) were upheld as deemed dividends due to the substantial interest of the assessee in the recipient companies.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249678</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>