<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (7) TMI 705 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249669</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, confirming the remittance of the enhanced penalty under Section 78, upholding the enhancement of penalty under Section 76, and setting aside the enhancement of penalty under Section 77. The appellant was not required to deposit any further amount towards the penalty under Section 78.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2015 10:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=360216" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (7) TMI 705 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249669</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, confirming the remittance of the enhanced penalty under Section 78, upholding the enhancement of penalty under Section 76, and setting aside the enhancement of penalty under Section 77. The appellant was not required to deposit any further amount towards the penalty under Section 78.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249669</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>