<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (7) TMI 696 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249660</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the demand of duty, interest, and penalty for Issues 1 and 3. Issue 2, regarding the calculation of the cost of production, was referred to a Larger Bench due to conflicting views. The Tribunal directed the matter to be considered for constituting a Larger Bench to resolve the issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2015 12:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=360199" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (7) TMI 696 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249660</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the demand of duty, interest, and penalty for Issues 1 and 3. Issue 2, regarding the calculation of the cost of production, was referred to a Larger Bench due to conflicting views. The Tribunal directed the matter to be considered for constituting a Larger Bench to resolve the issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249660</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>