<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (7) TMI 682 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249646</link>
    <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal for the assessment year 2004-05 was allowed, with the Tribunal upholding the Assessing Officer&#039;s addition on scholarship expenditure. For the assessment years 2006-07 and 2007-08, the appeals were partly allowed, with the Tribunal sustaining the AO&#039;s additions on scholarship expenditure but rejecting the Revenue&#039;s challenge on the allowance of depreciation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2014 08:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=360185" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (7) TMI 682 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249646</link>
      <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal for the assessment year 2004-05 was allowed, with the Tribunal upholding the Assessing Officer&#039;s addition on scholarship expenditure. For the assessment years 2006-07 and 2007-08, the appeals were partly allowed, with the Tribunal sustaining the AO&#039;s additions on scholarship expenditure but rejecting the Revenue&#039;s challenge on the allowance of depreciation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249646</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>