https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165467 Preventive detention under the COFEPOSA Act was examined on communication of grounds, consideration of retracted statements, delay in supplying documents, opportunity before the Advisory Board, and independent satisfaction of the detaining authority. The grounds were treated as effectively communicated where the detenus could understand the material and no real prejudice was shown. Omission to separately weigh the retraction was not fatal because the detention was supported by independent objective material and section 5A preserved the order. Delayed supply of annexures did not invalidate the detention absent prejudice, the representation before the Advisory Board was found adequate, and no mechanical acceptance of the Board's opinion or lack of independent application of mind was established. en-us Fri, 12 Apr 1985 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 31 Jul 2014 07:44:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165467 Preventive detention under the COFEPOSA Act was examined on communication of grounds, consideration of retracted statements, delay in supplying documents, opportunity before the Advisory Board, and independent satisfaction of the detaining authority. The grounds were treated as effectively communicated where the detenus could understand the material and no real prejudice was shown. Omission to separately weigh the retraction was not fatal because the detention was supported by independent objective material and section 5A preserved the order. Delayed supply of annexures did not invalidate the detention absent prejudice, the representation before the Advisory Board was found adequate, and no mechanical acceptance of the Board's opinion or lack of independent application of mind was established. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 12 Apr 1985 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165467