<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (3) TMI 1070 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165466</link>
    <description>Preventive detention is not vitiated merely because the co-traveller&#039;s records were not placed before the detaining authority, where the detention was founded on the detenue&#039;s own conduct and the omitted material could have been prejudicial. Delay in deciding a representation does not by itself invalidate detention; it must be unexplained or unreasonable, and the departmental delay here was treated as satisfactorily explained. Subjective satisfaction for preventive detention was upheld on the basis of the petitioner&#039;s travel pattern, the recovery of contraband in baggage, and the relevant circumstances showing preventive need. The detention order was upheld and the writ petition dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Mar 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2014 09:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=360157" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (3) TMI 1070 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165466</link>
      <description>Preventive detention is not vitiated merely because the co-traveller&#039;s records were not placed before the detaining authority, where the detention was founded on the detenue&#039;s own conduct and the omitted material could have been prejudicial. Delay in deciding a representation does not by itself invalidate detention; it must be unexplained or unreasonable, and the departmental delay here was treated as satisfactorily explained. Subjective satisfaction for preventive detention was upheld on the basis of the petitioner&#039;s travel pattern, the recovery of contraband in baggage, and the relevant circumstances showing preventive need. The detention order was upheld and the writ petition dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Mar 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165466</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>