https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249635 The High Court upheld the decision of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) in a case concerning the suspension and continuation of Customs House Agent (CHA) licenses. The Court ruled that the suspension orders could not persist without complying with the procedural requirements outlined in Regulation 22 of the Customs House Agents Licensing Regulations, 2004. The Court affirmed that the interim suspension under Regulation 20 must be followed by a formal inquiry under Regulation 22 before deciding on permanent suspension or revocation. As a result, the appeals were dismissed, and the CESTAT's orders setting aside the suspension were upheld. en-us Fri, 27 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 12 May 2015 14:17:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249635 The High Court upheld the decision of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) in a case concerning the suspension and continuation of Customs House Agent (CHA) licenses. The Court ruled that the suspension orders could not persist without complying with the procedural requirements outlined in Regulation 22 of the Customs House Agents Licensing Regulations, 2004. The Court affirmed that the interim suspension under Regulation 20 must be followed by a formal inquiry under Regulation 22 before deciding on permanent suspension or revocation. As a result, the appeals were dismissed, and the CESTAT's orders setting aside the suspension were upheld. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 27 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249635