https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249629 The court dismissed all writ petitions, vacated the interim stay, and disposed of all interlocutory applications. It found that the corrigendum/amendment by BCCL was clarificatory and justified, restricting service tax reimbursement to net payments made in cash or e-payment. The court agreed with BCCL that the reimbursement of service tax was governed by the contract terms and not by the Finance Act, 1994, or the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. Disputed facts regarding excise duty payments were deemed unsuitable for resolution through a writ petition. en-us Fri, 14 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 18 Jul 2014 13:47:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249629 The court dismissed all writ petitions, vacated the interim stay, and disposed of all interlocutory applications. It found that the corrigendum/amendment by BCCL was clarificatory and justified, restricting service tax reimbursement to net payments made in cash or e-payment. The court agreed with BCCL that the reimbursement of service tax was governed by the contract terms and not by the Finance Act, 1994, or the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. Disputed facts regarding excise duty payments were deemed unsuitable for resolution through a writ petition. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 14 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249629