<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (7) TMI 658 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249622</link>
    <description>An incomplete ST-18A declaration form, with the sender and transporter columns left blank, justified revisiting the penalty proceedings after the later Supreme Court ruling clarified the legal position in favour of the Revenue. However, because the assessee had not been given a fresh and specific opportunity to meet the alleged defects in light of that ruling, the concurrent orders were set aside. The matter was remanded to the assessing authority for de novo consideration of the penalty after issuing a specific show-cause notice and affording an effective hearing, in compliance with natural justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2014 12:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=360115" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (7) TMI 658 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249622</link>
      <description>An incomplete ST-18A declaration form, with the sender and transporter columns left blank, justified revisiting the penalty proceedings after the later Supreme Court ruling clarified the legal position in favour of the Revenue. However, because the assessee had not been given a fresh and specific opportunity to meet the alleged defects in light of that ruling, the concurrent orders were set aside. The matter was remanded to the assessing authority for de novo consideration of the penalty after issuing a specific show-cause notice and affording an effective hearing, in compliance with natural justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249622</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>