<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (7) TMI 644 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249608</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal of a partnership firm in a civil contracts business for the assessment year 2007-08. The appeal succeeded primarily due to the invalidity of the notice u/s. 148 and the unsustainable basis for re-assessment concerning the discrepancy between income figures in the return and TDS certificate. The judgment emphasized procedural irregularities and legal principles governing re-assessment proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 May 2017 16:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=360095" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (7) TMI 644 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249608</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal of a partnership firm in a civil contracts business for the assessment year 2007-08. The appeal succeeded primarily due to the invalidity of the notice u/s. 148 and the unsustainable basis for re-assessment concerning the discrepancy between income figures in the return and TDS certificate. The judgment emphasized procedural irregularities and legal principles governing re-assessment proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249608</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>