<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (7) TMI 638 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249602</link>
    <description>The Tribunal quashed the assessments framed under Section 153C for both assessment years due to the improper recording of the satisfaction note. Consequently, the Tribunal did not address the merits of the additions made by the AO. The assessee&#039;s appeals were allowed, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed as infructuous.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2014 08:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=360089" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (7) TMI 638 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249602</link>
      <description>The Tribunal quashed the assessments framed under Section 153C for both assessment years due to the improper recording of the satisfaction note. Consequently, the Tribunal did not address the merits of the additions made by the AO. The assessee&#039;s appeals were allowed, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed as infructuous.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249602</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>