<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (7) TMI 636 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249600</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. It found the assessee had adequately proven the genuineness of the expenditure and that the AO failed to disprove the claims. The Tribunal emphasized the lack of justification for disallowing the expenditure and that the assessee met its burden of proof. The appeal was dismissed on 23rd May 2014.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2014 08:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=360087" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (7) TMI 636 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249600</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. It found the assessee had adequately proven the genuineness of the expenditure and that the AO failed to disprove the claims. The Tribunal emphasized the lack of justification for disallowing the expenditure and that the assessee met its burden of proof. The appeal was dismissed on 23rd May 2014.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249600</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>