<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (7) TMI 622 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249586</link>
    <description>Section 22(3A) of the Andhra Pradesh Value Added Tax Act applies only where tax is separately added to an already estimated contract value; where no estimated value was notified at the tender stage, the deduction mechanism falls under section 22(3). The note explains that in an EPC works contract, the contractor had already sought quantification and the competent tax authority had fixed taxable turnover for deduction. On that basis, excess tax deducted from running bills was not authorised under the statutory scheme and could not be retained without remittance or assessment adjustment. The excess amount was therefore refundable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2014 17:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=360052" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (7) TMI 622 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249586</link>
      <description>Section 22(3A) of the Andhra Pradesh Value Added Tax Act applies only where tax is separately added to an already estimated contract value; where no estimated value was notified at the tender stage, the deduction mechanism falls under section 22(3). The note explains that in an EPC works contract, the contractor had already sought quantification and the competent tax authority had fixed taxable turnover for deduction. On that basis, excess tax deducted from running bills was not authorised under the statutory scheme and could not be retained without remittance or assessment adjustment. The excess amount was therefore refundable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249586</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>