<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (7) TMI 612 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249576</link>
    <description>Barrels supplied by customers and used repeatedly were treated as prima facie customer-supplied or durable, returnable packing materials, so their value may not form part of the assessable value of liquid glucose. Relying on Tata Chemicals Ltd. v. CCE, the Tribunal found a strong interim case for exclusion of such packing material value from duty computation and, on that basis, waived the pre-deposit requirement and stayed recovery pending appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2014 14:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=360039" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (7) TMI 612 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249576</link>
      <description>Barrels supplied by customers and used repeatedly were treated as prima facie customer-supplied or durable, returnable packing materials, so their value may not form part of the assessable value of liquid glucose. Relying on Tata Chemicals Ltd. v. CCE, the Tribunal found a strong interim case for exclusion of such packing material value from duty computation and, on that basis, waived the pre-deposit requirement and stayed recovery pending appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249576</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>