<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (5) TMI 368 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165462</link>
    <description>Section 5 of the Madhya Pradesh Sahayata Upkram (Vishesh Upbandh) Adhiniyam, 1978 operates as an overriding temporary moratorium protecting a relief undertaking from decrees, orders and other legal proceedings during the notified period. The Supreme Court read the word &quot;decree&quot; as covering even a valid decree obtained from outside the State and held that &quot;other legal proceedings&quot; is wide enough to include execution petitions. Execution of a transferred decree was therefore capable of suspension without impeaching the decree&#039;s validity. The protection was also held to extend beyond pre-notification debts, because the statutory language and object were to shield the undertaking from litigation generally for the duration of the notification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 May 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2014 08:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=360030" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (5) TMI 368 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165462</link>
      <description>Section 5 of the Madhya Pradesh Sahayata Upkram (Vishesh Upbandh) Adhiniyam, 1978 operates as an overriding temporary moratorium protecting a relief undertaking from decrees, orders and other legal proceedings during the notified period. The Supreme Court read the word &quot;decree&quot; as covering even a valid decree obtained from outside the State and held that &quot;other legal proceedings&quot; is wide enough to include execution petitions. Execution of a transferred decree was therefore capable of suspension without impeaching the decree&#039;s validity. The protection was also held to extend beyond pre-notification debts, because the statutory language and object were to shield the undertaking from litigation generally for the duration of the notification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 May 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165462</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>