<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (7) TMI 602 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249566</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the assessee&#039;s appeal regarding the addition of unexplained stock but upheld the deletion of the disallowance for labour payment. It also confirmed the disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) for hallmark checking expenses. The Revenue&#039;s appeal for additional unaccounted income was dismissed, affirming the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)&#039;s corrected calculation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2014 08:39:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=360015" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (7) TMI 602 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249566</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the assessee&#039;s appeal regarding the addition of unexplained stock but upheld the deletion of the disallowance for labour payment. It also confirmed the disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) for hallmark checking expenses. The Revenue&#039;s appeal for additional unaccounted income was dismissed, affirming the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)&#039;s corrected calculation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249566</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>