<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Rules Past Activities Not Proven by Recent Clandestine Actions.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=19349</link>
    <description>Merely because during the period in question the appellant was indulging in clandestine activities, would not ‘ipso facto’ lead to establish that they have been indulging in such activities even during the past period - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2014 14:06:03 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2014 14:06:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=359981" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Rules Past Activities Not Proven by Recent Clandestine Actions.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=19349</link>
      <description>Merely because during the period in question the appellant was indulging in clandestine activities, would not ‘ipso facto’ lead to establish that they have been indulging in such activities even during the past period - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2014 14:06:03 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=19349</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>