<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (7) TMI 586 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249550</link>
    <description>The High Court modified the CESTAT&#039;s order, directing the appellant to furnish a bank guarantee of Rs. 50 crores within eight weeks for a waiver of predeposit and stay of recovery. The Tribunal was instructed to hear the appeal on its merits without being influenced by its interim observations. The appeal was allowed with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2015 11:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=359971" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (7) TMI 586 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249550</link>
      <description>The High Court modified the CESTAT&#039;s order, directing the appellant to furnish a bank guarantee of Rs. 50 crores within eight weeks for a waiver of predeposit and stay of recovery. The Tribunal was instructed to hear the appeal on its merits without being influenced by its interim observations. The appeal was allowed with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249550</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>