<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (7) TMI 577 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249540</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the revisional authority&#039;s decision to deny tax deductions to the assessee due to incorrect invoicing practices. The Court emphasized the necessity of separately indicating the value of goods and tax amount in invoices for claiming deductions under section 9 of the KVAT Act and rule 29 of the KVAT Rules. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the importance of adhering to invoicing regulations for tax benefits and supporting the assessing authority&#039;s decision to deny deductions based on non-compliance with invoicing requirements.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2014 12:33:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=359959" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (7) TMI 577 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249540</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the revisional authority&#039;s decision to deny tax deductions to the assessee due to incorrect invoicing practices. The Court emphasized the necessity of separately indicating the value of goods and tax amount in invoices for claiming deductions under section 9 of the KVAT Act and rule 29 of the KVAT Rules. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the importance of adhering to invoicing regulations for tax benefits and supporting the assessing authority&#039;s decision to deny deductions based on non-compliance with invoicing requirements.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249540</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>