<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (7) TMI 574 - CESTAT  MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249537</link>
    <description>The Tribunal granted waiver of pre-deposit to the appellants, allowing them to avail the CENVAT credit denied, as there was no finding of fraud or willful misstatement against the job worker. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, permitting them to claim the service tax credit under Rule 9(1)(bb) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004, and stayed the recovery of duty, interest, and penalty during the appeal process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2014 12:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=359955" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (7) TMI 574 - CESTAT  MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249537</link>
      <description>The Tribunal granted waiver of pre-deposit to the appellants, allowing them to avail the CENVAT credit denied, as there was no finding of fraud or willful misstatement against the job worker. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, permitting them to claim the service tax credit under Rule 9(1)(bb) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004, and stayed the recovery of duty, interest, and penalty during the appeal process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249537</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>