<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (7) TMI 566 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249529</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the demand for interest on the appellant&#039;s issue of supplementary invoices for price variation in goods sold earlier, citing the Supreme Court&#039;s decision in CCE Pune Vs SKF India Ltd. The penalty imposed on the appellant was set aside, following the same precedent. All appeals were partly allowed, with interest upheld and the penalty overturned. The Tribunal disposed of stay applications accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2014 11:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=359946" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (7) TMI 566 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249529</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the demand for interest on the appellant&#039;s issue of supplementary invoices for price variation in goods sold earlier, citing the Supreme Court&#039;s decision in CCE Pune Vs SKF India Ltd. The penalty imposed on the appellant was set aside, following the same precedent. All appeals were partly allowed, with interest upheld and the penalty overturned. The Tribunal disposed of stay applications accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249529</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>