https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249525 The court upheld the President's explanation that the property purchased in an individual's name using society funds was intended for the society's benefit, not personal use. It found no evidence of illegal diversion of funds and affirmed the property's ownership by the Society. The court deemed the impugned orders unjustified and arbitrary, directing authorities to reconsider the petitioners' applications within a specified timeframe, emphasizing the need for compliance with legal provisions and justifying administrative actions in line with the law. en-us Wed, 02 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 16 Jul 2014 11:35:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249525 The court upheld the President's explanation that the property purchased in an individual's name using society funds was intended for the society's benefit, not personal use. It found no evidence of illegal diversion of funds and affirmed the property's ownership by the Society. The court deemed the impugned orders unjustified and arbitrary, directing authorities to reconsider the petitioners' applications within a specified timeframe, emphasizing the need for compliance with legal provisions and justifying administrative actions in line with the law. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 02 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249525