<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (7) TMI 546 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249509</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the assessee&#039;s eligibility for deduction under Section 10B based on registration with the Software Technology Park of India. The decision emphasized that STPI registration sufficed for the deduction, contrary to the assessing officer&#039;s stance requiring Board approval under the Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951. The CIT(A) and Tribunal both supported the assessee, relying on consistent Tribunal precedents. The outcome rested on the interpretation that STPI registration met the Section 10B criteria, leading to the rejection of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2014 17:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=359916" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (7) TMI 546 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249509</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the assessee&#039;s eligibility for deduction under Section 10B based on registration with the Software Technology Park of India. The decision emphasized that STPI registration sufficed for the deduction, contrary to the assessing officer&#039;s stance requiring Board approval under the Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951. The CIT(A) and Tribunal both supported the assessee, relying on consistent Tribunal precedents. The outcome rested on the interpretation that STPI registration met the Section 10B criteria, leading to the rejection of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249509</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>