https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165457 The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the conviction and death sentence imposed on the appellant. The Court found the grant of a certificate under Article 134(1)(c) of the Constitution unnecessary, as no substantial question of law or principle was involved. The conviction was based on reliable circumstantial evidence, including the appellant's presence at the scene, bloodstained clothing, and weapon recovery. Procedural irregularities during seizure and search did not invalidate the evidence's weight. The Court affirmed the lower courts' findings, concluding no legal flaws justifying interference with the conviction. en-us Thu, 03 Nov 1955 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 09 Sep 2014 08:08:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165457 The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the conviction and death sentence imposed on the appellant. The Court found the grant of a certificate under Article 134(1)(c) of the Constitution unnecessary, as no substantial question of law or principle was involved. The conviction was based on reliable circumstantial evidence, including the appellant's presence at the scene, bloodstained clothing, and weapon recovery. Procedural irregularities during seizure and search did not invalidate the evidence's weight. The Court affirmed the lower courts' findings, concluding no legal flaws justifying interference with the conviction. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 03 Nov 1955 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165457