https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165457 A certificate under Article 134(1)(c) is confined to cases raising a substantial question of law or principle, so it is not justified where the conviction rests on concurrent findings based only on appreciation of circumstantial evidence. Irregularities in search procedure, including the choice of search witnesses, affect the weight of the evidence rather than the legality of the proceedings, and Section 103 CrPC governs searches of places, not seizure of shoes worn by an accused. On the accepted circumstantial chain, bloodstained articles, recovery of the weapon, motive, and medical evidence, no legal infirmity or failure of justice was shown. en-us Thu, 03 Nov 1955 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 09 Sep 2014 08:08:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165457 A certificate under Article 134(1)(c) is confined to cases raising a substantial question of law or principle, so it is not justified where the conviction rests on concurrent findings based only on appreciation of circumstantial evidence. Irregularities in search procedure, including the choice of search witnesses, affect the weight of the evidence rather than the legality of the proceedings, and Section 103 CrPC governs searches of places, not seizure of shoes worn by an accused. On the accepted circumstantial chain, bloodstained articles, recovery of the weapon, motive, and medical evidence, no legal infirmity or failure of justice was shown. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 03 Nov 1955 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165457