https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165456 Writ jurisdiction remained available despite an arbitration clause and alleged alternative remedy because the recovery dispute involved the State and its authorities, who were not parties to the contract, and the issue was not wholly covered by arbitration. On entry tax, liability attached to the respondent-corporation because it purchased and took delivery of goods in Haryana and brought them into Bihar; the contractor was not contractually or statutorily made liable. Deduction of entry tax from the contractor's bills was therefore unsupported by law and contrary to the rule that tax can be collected only by authority of law. en-us Thu, 07 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 15 Sep 2014 08:14:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165456 Writ jurisdiction remained available despite an arbitration clause and alleged alternative remedy because the recovery dispute involved the State and its authorities, who were not parties to the contract, and the issue was not wholly covered by arbitration. On entry tax, liability attached to the respondent-corporation because it purchased and took delivery of goods in Haryana and brought them into Bihar; the contractor was not contractually or statutorily made liable. Deduction of entry tax from the contractor's bills was therefore unsupported by law and contrary to the rule that tax can be collected only by authority of law. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Thu, 07 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165456